Ada Overton Walker: Known During the Early 1900s as “The Queen of the Cakewalk”

5 Posted by - January 23, 2023 - BLACK WOMEN, ENTERTAINMENT, LATEST POSTS
Known for her sense of style and moves on the dance floor, Ada Overton Walker, was dubbed as “The Queen of the Cakewalk.” Walker was an African-American vaudeville performer and the wife of vaudevillian George Walker. She along with her husband appeared in several shows with their partner Bert Williams.
Walker was born on February 14, 1880, in Richmond, Virginia. She later moved with her family to New York City where she gained her formal education and musical training. In the late 1880s, she started her career in the “Black Patti’s Troubadours” music chorus. She gained national attention in the early 1900s when she performed “Miss Hannah from Savannah” in the show “Sons of Ham.” In 1903, she gave one of the best performances ever seen at Buckingham Palace, which transformed her into an international star.
Walker worked for decades in the business and was well-known throughout the country for her praised performances. She was well aware of how the roles of women had an impact on race relations of the time, and worked hard to break the stereotypes of black women in entertainment, who were often viewed as being oversexed and having a lack of morals.
After the death of her husband, Walker went on to start her own company. She later became known for her dance performance “Salamone” at Hammerstein’s Victoria Theater. Walker’s dancing and singing ability was compared to that of Florence Mills and Josephine Baker. Walker died on October 11, 1914.


  • Dario Coyan June 12, 2019 - 11:28 am

    6/12/2019 Love the site– very easy to navigate and much to see!

  • Yvonne Atkinson July 31, 2019 - 4:38 pm

    I appreciate that blackthen is enlightening the world about the wonderful contributions Black people have made in the United States, but after reading the “Ada Overton Walker: Known During the Early 1900s as “The Queen of the Cakewalk”” excerpt I have some concerns:
    There were factual errors. The errors were obvious and easily corrected with a little research. This concerns me because it makes me wonder about the validity of other “historical facts” that blackthen has published. It appears as though blackthen isn’t respectful of either the information they are publishing or of their audience. In the future I will be very cautious about blackthen posts. Backthen can begin rectify the errors by citing the information published.